There is no doubt that globalization
has turned the world into
one big village. It is just as well that a person, in the split
of
a second, can get information across to another, a striking
thousand miles away. Doubts, however, accrue from the
impact this very ‘internet-time’ has on the slow
progress of
poor people, especially in Africa.
By Jean-Marie
Nsambu
KOFI Annan, a Ghanaian diplomat, who served as seventh secretary-general
of the United Nations, once said that people could not wait
for governments to do it all, because globalization operated
on “Internet-time,” yet governments tend to be slowmoving
by nature, “because they have to build political support
for every step.” The 2001 Nobel peace prize winner is
also quoted, “It has been said that arguing against globalization
is like arguing against the laws of gravity.”
Like him, Bill Clinton believes, “Globalization is not
something we can hold off or turn off.” A former Democrat
US president Clinton says, “it (globalization) is the
economic equivalent of a force of nature – like wind or
water.”
But, for those who appreciate the implications of this global
phenomenon on poor people, it has the potential of wiping out
industrial enterprise and leaving perpetual underdevelopment
in its wake. To the opponents, globalization is a means of the
poor to feed the rich – in other words – being preyed
upon.
Notice to all our
subscribers. If you get your personal copy of Leadership directly
from the Editor, you can find out whether you have an outstanding
balance, OB, to pay from your address label. If you have any
queries, please do contact us.